BOWEN V. MICHIGAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS
476 U.S. 667 (1986)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the reimbursement for board certified family
physicians.
FACTS: HHS set higher Medicare reimbursement levels for board certified family physicians
than for the identical services performed by nonboard certified family physicians. Ps
claimed that those distinctions violated both the Medicare Act and the Fifth Amendment.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment