SEC V. CHENERY CORP. (I)
318 U.S. 80 (1943)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a reorganization under the Public Utility
Holding Company Act.
FACTS: The Chenery's (P) were officers, directors, and controlling shareholders of the
Federal Water Service Corporation. They were subject to reorganization under the Public
Utility Holding Company Act. From 1937-4, P's negotiated with the SEC over the terms of a
proposed voluntary reorganization that called for the merger of Federal with certain
affiliated corporations into a single new corporation with one class of common stock. P's
were unsuccessful in persuading the SEC to authorize holders of class B common stock to
exchange these shares for common stock in the reorganized company. Participation was limited
by the SEC to preferred stock and class A common with the preferred shareholders getting
94.7 percent of the common. During the negotiations, Ps purchased 12,407 shares of preferred
stock. They purchased those preferred shares at substantially less than book value and that
sum of stock would have been entitled to more than 10 percent of the reorganized company's
common shares. The Commission found that it could not approve the proposed plan so long as
the preferred shares acquired by Ps would be permitted to share on a parity with other
preferred stock. There was no finding of fraud or a lack of disclosure but they reasoned
that P's managers were fiduciaries and under a duty of fair dealing not to trade in the
securities of the corporation while plans for its reorganization were before the Commission.
The Commission plan then stated that the preferred stock held by Ps could not be traded in
but must be surrendered at cost plus 4 percent interest. The Commission approved the plan
and Ps appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment