STEEL COMPANY V. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT
523 U.S. 83 (1998)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a private enforcement action under the Emergency Planning
and Community Right to Know Act of 1986.
FACTS: Citizens (P) sued Steel Company (D) for past violations of EPCRA. EPCRA
established a framework of state, regional and local agencies designed to inform the public
about the presence of hazardous and toxic chemicals and to provide for emergency response in
the event of a health threatening release. Under the EPCRA, companies were required to file
annual emergency and hazardous chemical inventory forms and toxic chemical release forms.
The EPCRA has many enforcement provisions but this suit involved the citizen suit provision
section 11046(a)(1) which authorized civil penalties as well as injunctive relief under
section 11046(c). Prior to private suit, P must give 60 days notice to the EPA, the State
and the alleged violator. P filed notice to the proper authorities alleging that D had not
filed any of the required EPCRA reports since the Acts inception. The sixty-day waiting
period expired and the EPA decided not to sue D so P filed suit. D filed rule 12(b)(1) and
(6) motions contending that because it filings were up to date when the complaint was filed,
the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit for a present violation and the EPCRA
did not allow suits for purely historical violations. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment