EX PARTE HEIGHO
110 P. 1029 (Idaho 1910).
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a writ of habeas corpus to challenge an indictment for manslaughter.
FACTS: Heigho (D) confronted Barton upon hearing that Barton had made slanderous remarks about him. Barton's mother-in-law, became excited when she noticed that D was wearing a gun. A fight ensued and Barton's mother-in-law became increasingly excited. After Barton's wife separated D and her husband, they noticed that the mother-in-law was dying. She had suffered a fatal heart attack. D was indicted for having committed involuntary manslaughter. D challenged the indictment with a writ of habeas corpus.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment