GOODWIN V. AGASSIZ
186 N.E. 659 (1933)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Action for rescission and accounting. Goodwin (P) appealed a final decree dismissing an action for losses suffered when he sold stock to Agassiz (Ds), directors of corporation; P alleged Ds breached fiduciary duty by failing to disclose information regarding company's mining assets.
FACTS: Agassiz (D) was president and one of the directors of the Cliff Mining Company, which had not been very productive. D and other insiders had received a geologist's report indicating a strong possibility that one of their properties contained major copper deposits. Goodwin (P), thinking exploratory operations for the company a bust, sold his stock on the open stock exchange and D bought it anonymously. Copper deposits were found and the stock consequently increased in value. There was no communication between the parties. P would not have sold his stock if he had known of the geologist's theory. P alleged D breached his fiduciary duty as a director by not disclosing the information. The trial judge ruled that there was no fiduciary relation requiring disclosure by Ds to P before buying his stock in the manner in which they did. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment