UNITED STATES V. FEOLA 420 U.S. 671 (1975) CASE BRIEF

UNITED STATES V. FEOLA

420 U.S. 671 (1975)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Feola (D) and others were convicted in a jury trial of violating 18 U.S.C. 111 for having assaulted federal officers (here undercover narcotics agents) in the performance of their official duties, and of conspiring to commit that offense, in violation of the general conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. 371. Ds appealed on grounds that the jury was not required to conclude that Ds were aware that their quarry were federal officers. The Court of Appeals affirmed but reversed the conspiracy convictions on the ground that the trial court had erred in not charging that knowledge of the victim's official identity must be proved in order to convict on the 371 charge.

FACTS: D and his confederates arranged for a sale of heroin to buyers who turned out to be federal undercover agents. D planned to palm off on the purchasers, for a substantial sum, a form of sugar in place of heroin and, should that ruse fail, simply to surprise their unwitting buyers and relieve them of the cash they had brought along for payment. The plan failed when one agent, his suspicions being aroused, drew his revolver in time to counter an assault upon another agent from the rear. D was charged with conspiring to assault and with assaulting federal agents. The trial court read instructions to the jury that there was no need to conclude that D even knew that the agents were in fact federal agents to convict of a conspiracy to assault a federal officer. D was found guilty. The court of appeals reversed; knowledge of the victim's official identity must be proved in order to convict on such a conspiracy charge. The Appeals court relied on Judge Learned Hand's opinion in United States v. Crimmins, 123 F.2d 271 (CA2 1941), holding that scienter of a factual element that confers federal jurisdiction, while unnecessary for conviction of the substantive offense, is required in order to sustain a conviction for conspiracy to commit the substantive offense.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner


No comments:

Post a Comment