UNITED STATES V. RESENDIZ-PONCE
549 U.S. 102 (2007)
NATURE OF THE CASE: The United States (P) appealed a reversal of a denial of a motion to have an indictment dismissed in Resendiz-Poncer's (D) violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326(a) by attempting to reenter the United States after having been deported.
FACTS: D was deported twice, once in 1988 and again in 2002, before his attempted reentry on June 1, 2003. D walked up to a port of entry and displayed a photo identification of his cousin to the border agent. D told the agent that he was a legal resident and that he was traveling to Calexico, California. Because he did not resemble his cousin, D was questioned, taken into custody, and ultimately charged with a violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326(a). The indictment stated that D knowingly and intentionally attempted to enter the United States of America in violation of the statute. D moved to dismiss the indictment, contending that it 'fail[ed] to allege an essential element, an overt act, or to state the essential facts of such overt act.' The District Court denied the motion and, after the jury found D guilty, sentenced respondent to a 63-month term of imprisonment. D appealed. The Ninth Circuit reversed, reasoning that an indictment's omission of 'an essential element of the offense is a fatal flaw not subject to mere harmless error analysis.' P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment