WASSENAAR V. PANOS
331 N.W.2d 357 (1983)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the interpretation of a stipulated damage clause in an employment contract. Wassenaar (P) appealed a reversal of a trial court decisions that gave judgment to P on P's action against Panos (D) seeking compensation under the stipulated damage clause in P's employment contract.
FACTS: D terminated Wassenaar's (P) employment 21 months prior to his contract's expiration. P was then unemployed from April 1, 1978 to June 14, 1978 when he obtained employment and remained so employed until May 1981. The jury found that P was terminated without just cause. The jury awarded P $24,640, which was his salary for 21 months based on the direction of a stipulated damages clause. D appealed. The appeals court gave de novo review to that clause to determine if it was a penalty and thus void. The court ruled that the clause was unreasonable on its face as damages to an employee could be readily ascertained in the event of a breach by how long the party remained unemployed. The court of appeals did not consider any other facts than the actual contract language and the black letter law relating to the measure of damages for breach of employment contracts. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment