WILLIAMS V. NEW YORK
337 U.S. 241 (1949)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over sentencing and whether Due Process requires that a person convicted after a fair trial be confronted with and permitted to cross-examine witnesses as to his prior criminal record considered by the judge in determining what sentence to impose.
FACTS: Williams (D) was found guilty of murder in the first degree. The jury recommended life imprisonment, but the trial judge imposed a sentence of death. The judge imposed death stating that the trial evidence had been considered in the light of additional information obtained through the court's 'Probation Department, and through other sources.' This additional information was allowed to be considered under 482 of New York Criminal Code. The evidence used indicated that the judge thought that D was responsible for 30 other burglaries in the area. D had not been convicted of these burglaries, although the judge had information that he had confessed to some and had been identified as the perpetrator of some of the others. The judge also found that D had a morbid sexuality that had classified him as a menace to society. D appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence over D's contention that the Statute is in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The sentence of death was based upon information supplied by witnesses with whom D had not been confronted and as to whom he had no opportunity for cross-examination or rebuttal. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment