ARMSTRONG V. BANGOR MILL SUPPLY CORP.
145 A. 741 (1929)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Bangor (P) filed a motion for a new trial from a jury verdict for
Armstrong (P), in P's action in assumpsit against D under an implied warranty to perform
labor in a workmanlike manner.
FACTS: P sent a broken crankshaft from his lath mill to D's machine shop for repairs. In
making the repairs D's workmen left the shaft out of alignment, necessitating its return
from P for realignment. P's mill was shut down six days with a resultant loss of earnings
and expenses of maintenance. P sued D and got the verdict for these losses and expenses
incidental to the crankshaft repairs. D motioned for a new trial.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment