COPELAND V. BEARD
217 Ala. 216, 115 So. 389 (1928)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a debt. Copeland (D), creditor, petitioned to
review a judgment, which affirmed a judgment for Beard (P), debtor, in a case regarding P's
sale and conveyance of property to a purchaser and the right of D to maintain an action
against P.
FACTS: When a debtor sells and conveys real and personal property, upon consideration in
part that the purchaser shall assume and pay specified debts of the vendor, and on the same
day, before the creditors for whose benefit the promise is made have assented thereto, the
purchaser resells and conveys the property upon consideration in part that the subpurchaser
shall assume and pay the indebtedness, and the original vendor debtor thereupon releases the
original purchaser from this promise to pay, can such a creditor thereafter maintain an
action of assumpsit against the original purchaser (this was the issue proposed by the case
book but it states the facts of the case in rhetorical terms). P sued D to recover a debt.
The owner of real property owed P a debt. That property owner sold his property to D and D
agreed to pay the original debt owed to P. D immediately resold the property to a third
purchaser and that purchaser agreed to take on the debt owed to P. The original property
owner agreed to release D from the promise to pay P. Or course the third party defaulted and
P sued D.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment