DELZER V. UNITED BANK OF BISMARK
559 N.W.2d 531 (1997)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Delzer (P) appealed a judgment, rendered after a third remand of the
case, which granted United's (D) motion for judgment as a matter of law in P's action for
deceit and breach of a contract to loan money.
FACTS: P and D entered into a loan agreement for P to pledge all of their assets and
their son's equipment as collateral for repayment of money to be loaned by D. P contends D
orally agreed to lend them $ 00,000--an operating loan of $150,000, to be followed by
additional loans totaling $150,000 for the purchase of cattle. P executed a promissory note
for $150,000, and D advanced that amount. D never advanced any funds to purchase cattle. Ps
were unable to pay their debts, lost their ranch when the holder of the first mortgage
foreclosed, and lost all of the other assets pledged as security. P sued D. The appeals
court reversed a summary judgment of dismissal and remanded for trial. It again reversed a
summary judgment dismissing P's action against D. After the remand the trial court
bifurcated liability and damages. The jury returned a verdict finding that D did not make a
binding oral contract to lend $150,000 to purchase cattle and D knowingly deceived P into
giving all their property as security for a $300,000 loan when D knew it was only going to
loan them $150,000. The trial court ruled the jury's findings were inconsistent and granted
D's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and granted a new trial if the judgment
notwithstanding was reversed on appeal. The appeals court again reversed the judgment
notwithstanding on the deceit claim, affirmed the grant of a new trial, and remanded for a
new trial on both the contract and the deceit claims. On the third remand, the case was
again tried to a jury. It found that D breached an 'oral contract to lend $150,000 and
willfully deceived the P by promising the $150,000 for cattle when d had no intention of
lending the additional $150,000. The jury awarded no damages for breach of contract, awarded
damages of $538,000 for deceit, and awarded exemplary damages of $3,000,000. D moved for
judgment as a matter of law on the deceit claim or, alternatively, for a new trial. The
court entered a judgment of dismissal, and P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment