GODBURN V. MESERVE
37 A.2d 235 (1944)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a case about a contract for care in return for the promise
to leave a house under a will. Meserve (D) appealed from the denial of their motion to set
aside the verdict for Godburn (P) in their breach of contract action against D.
FACTS: Godburn (P) lived in Wells' house as a tenant. Wells was infirm and they entered
into an agreement that if they would care for Wells she would leave them the property on her
death. A will was drafted in accordance with the agreement and P occupied the house for over
five years when P moved out and did nothing further in performance of the contract. Just
before P moved out a modification of the agreement was proposed but that was declined by
Wells. P proposed a modification of the agreement whereby Wells would have two rooms, get
her own meals and do her own laundry, and Ps would make an increased cash payment monthly.
That was declined. P moved out and Wells revoked her will. She died a year later, at the age
of eighty-three. During the first two years that the parties lived together their relations
were generally harmonious and mutually agreeable, but thereafter increasing friction
developed. These facts are undisputed. Further evidence showed that Wells was a difficult
person to provide for. The jury gave the award to P because of the decedent's breach of the
express agreement. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment