GRENIER V. COMPRATT CONSTR. CO.
454 A.2d 1289 (1983)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a contract condition of payment. Compratt
(D), contractor, appealed a decision, which rendered judgment for Grenier (P),
subcontractor, on P's action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract, and that
denied D's counterclaim to enforce a liquidated damages clause of the contract.
FACTS: Grenier (P) entered into a settlement agreement with Compratt (D) which entitled P
to $25,500 upon the completion of certain subdivision roads by June 30, 1978. Completion was
conditioned upon P receiving a letter signed by the City Engineer certifying that a
certificate of occupancy can be obtained on any lot in the subdivision as of 5 p.m. on June
30, 1978. The roads were finished but P was unable to provide the stipulated letter because
the City Engineer did not ordinarily write such letters. The assistant city attorney
authorized the building inspector to issue certificates of occupancy for the roads in
question on July 10, 1978. The contract between P-D called for liquidated damages for
failure to meet the June 30th date. The trial court found that the inspector's letter
satisfied the contract and that D had been damaged by the 10-day delay. The trial court
struck D's damages clause as a penalty because by September 7th damages under that clause
amounted to $26,571.42. Accordingly, the court awarded P judgment for $25,500 minus $2,500.
D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment