HAUER V. UNION STATE BANK OF WAUTOMA
532 N.W.2D 456 (1995)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Wautoma (D) appealed a judgment, which voided a loan made to Hauer
(P) and required the bank to return P's collateral, and dismissed the bank's counterclaim to
recover proceeds from the loan on P's claims that her mental incapacity voided the loan
agreement. P cross-appealed the denial of attorney's fees and punitive damages.
FACTS: P suffered a brain injury in a motorcycle accident. She was subsequently
adjudicated to be incompetent, resulting in a guardian being appointed by the court. P's
guardianship was terminated based upon a letter from her treating physician, Kenneth Viste.
Viste opined that P had recovered to the point where she had ongoing memory, showed good
judgment, was reasonable in her goals and plans and could manage her own affairs. Her
monthly income after the accident was $900, which consisted of social security disability
and interest income from a mutual fund worth approximately $80,000. D loaned Ben Eilbes
$7600 to start a small business. Eilbes was denied an additional $000 loan from the Bank.
Eilbes was in default on the loan. Eilbes met P through her daughter, who told Eilbes about
the existence of P's mutual fund. Eilbes discussed his business with P on several occasions
and P expressed an interest in becoming an investor in the business. P could only sell her
stocks at certain times, so Eilbes suggested that she take out a short-term loan using the
stocks as collateral. Eilbes told P that if she loaned him money, he would give her a job,
pay her interest on the loan and pay the loan when it came due. P agreed. P contacted D and
told D all the details. Eilbes told D that he would use the money invested by P in part to
either bring the payments current on his defaulted loan or pay the loan off in full. D then
called P's stockbroker and financial consultant, Stephen Landolt, in an effort to verify the
existence of P's fund. Landolt told D that P needed the interest income to live on and that
he wished D would not use it as collateral for a loan. D also conceded that it was possible
that Landolt told him that P was suffering from brain damage, but did not specifically
recall that part of their conversation. D would be willing to loan P $30,000. D gave Eilbes
a loan application to give to P to fill out. P and Eilbes went to meet with D and sign the
necessary paperwork. Prior to this date, D had not spoken to or met with P. During this
meeting D explained the terms of the loan to P--that she would sign a consumer
single-payment note due in six months and give D a security interest in her mutual fund as
collateral. D did not notice anything that would cause him to believe that P did not
understand the loan transaction. On April 26, 1990, the date the loan matured, P filed suit
against D and Eilbes. P subsequently amended her complaint three times. D filed a
counterclaim for judgment on the defaulted loan. In the third amended complaint, P alleged
the following specific causes of action: (1) D knew or should have known that she lacked the
mental capacity to understand the loan, (2) D intentionally misrepresented, negligently
misrepresented, or misrepresented the circumstances surrounding the loan on which she
relied, and (3) D breached a fiduciary duty owed to her. D moved for summary judgment on the
grounds that P failed to state any claim for which relief could be granted. The trial court
dismissed P's misrepresentation claims. P dismissed Eilbes because he appeared to be
judgment proof and was filing bankruptcy. A twelve-person jury subsequently found that P
lacked the mental capacity to enter into the loan and that D failed to act in good faith.
The trial court denied D's motions after verdict and entered judgment voiding the loan
contract, dismissing D's counterclaim and ordering D to return P's collateral. D appeals.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment