HINSON V. JEFFERSON
215 S.E.2d 102 (1975)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the sale of land. Hinson (P), purchaser,
filed an action against Jefferson (D), sellers, for the recovery of the purchase price for a
parcel or lot of land and for the cancellation of the deed whereby D conveyed the lot or
parcel of land P. The Court of Appeals vacated the trial court's judgment in D's' favor and
D appealed
FACTS: P purchased land from Jefferson for the purpose of building a home. When P decided
to build it was discovered that the land was unfit for a septic system because of it was
only 2.6 feet above the water table of Black Swamp and was subject to flooding. The
improvements needed to fix the flooding problem would cost several hundred thousand dollars.
P's building permit was denied. Neither P nor D was aware that the land could not support a
septic system. P did not allege any fraud by D but sued to rescind the sale. The deed from D
to P contained no covenant or warranty that the land was suitable for the construction of a
residence. But the deed contained other restrictions against noxious or offensive trade, the
erection of signs or billboards, and the storage of trade inventories, trucks or tractors
and that no residence should be constructed with a cost of less than $25,000 or without D
approval of the plans. The trial court concluded that as a matter of law P was not entitled
to relief. The Court of Appeals reversed under mutual mistake of material fact and total
failure of consideration.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment