INGLE V. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC.
328 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2003)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Ingle (P), employee, filed an employment discrimination action
against Circuit (D) employer. D moved to compel arbitration. The District Court denied the
motion to compel arbitration. D appealed.
FACTS: P applied for work at D. She was required to sign an arbitration agreement for D
to consider her employment application. By signing the arbitration agreement, P agreed to
resolve all employment-related legal claims through arbitration. On June 21, 1999, P filed
an action against D alleging claims of sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and disability
discrimination. D moved to compel arbitration. The district court entered an order denying
the motion on the ground that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable in that D's form
application for employment unlawfully conditioned P's employment on her agreement to forego
statutory rights and remedies. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment