LEAL V. HOLTVOGT
702 N.E.2d 1246 (Ohio 1998)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Both parties appealed damages awarded.
FACTS: Holtvogt (D) owned and operated Shady Glen Arabians, a horse barn in Miami County,
Ohio. They were experienced in Arabian horse training, breeding, boarding, selling, and
showing. In 1992, the Leals (P), novices in the equine industry, decided to begin raising
horses. P began visiting Shady Glen Arabians regularly to learn how to ride and handle
horses. P began spending three to four days each week at D's barn helping with the horses. P
decided they wanted to start a breeding program by purchasing a stallion to breed with a
mare they owned. D offered P a one-half interest in Mc Que Jabask, an Arabian stallion that
D owned. D represented that Mc Que Jabask was a national top ten champion in three
categories; he was an all-around winning stallion; he earns $20,000.00 per year in stud
fees; he is capable of attaining national show titles again; and his foals were selling for
$6,000 to $10,000 each. P and D entered into a contract of sale for a one-half interest in
Mc Que Jabask for $16,000. The contract also established a partnership agreement, which
called for the parties to share equally in the expenses and profits arising from their joint
ownership of Mc Que Jabask. Prior to January, 1994, Mc Que Jabask had been treated for
lameness and was suffering a chronic lameness condition in his right rear and fore fetlocks.
D had taken the stallion for lameness treatments numerous times. D did not disclose this
information to P. Ps were dissatisfied with the partnership and wanted either a refund of
their money or a remedy for their concerns. In March, 1995, the mortality insurance on Mc
Que Jabask lapsed. Mary Leal (P), a former Dayton police officer, was unhappy with the
partnership. She began making disparaging remarks about D's honesty and integrity to the
past and present customers of Shady Glen Arabians. D claimed that he suffered from
depression, had visited some medical doctors, and was on medication. D could not prove any
business or economic damages due to Mary Leal's remarks. Mc Que Jabask died from stomach
ulcer complications. Since neither party had renewed the stallion's mortality insurance, Mc
Que Jabask was uninsured. P sued D who then brought counterclaims against P. The Court found
that D had negligently misrepresented the stallion's condition and that they had breached an
'express warranty on the condition of the horse for the purposes intended' and awarded P
$16,000 in compensatory damages. The trial court awarded D $ 800.23 in compensatory damages
for the services they had provided for these four horses. The court also found that Mary
Leal slandered D and, after concluding that D's damages were minimal to nominal, awarded him
$ 1,000 in compensatory damages. The trial court awarded D $ 3,000 for punitive damages and
attorney fees. Both parties appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment