LLOYD V. MURPHY
25 Cal.2d 48, 153 P.2d 47 (1944)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a lease.
FACTS: Lloyd (D) leased premises to Murphy (P) to be used to sell new cars only but was
occasionally permitted to sell used cars. The federal government restricted the sale of new
cars on January 1, 1942 due to WW II. That order was modified to permit only a certain class
of persons to buy new cars. P was amendable to allow D the latitude to stay in business, but
D informed P that he could not operate and vacated the premises. P rented the property to
others and then sued for declaratory relief to determine the rights under the contract and
for unpaid rent. The trial court found that the war-time conditions did not terminate the
lease. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment