MONARCO V. LO GRECO
35 Cal. 2d 621, 220 P.2d 737 (1950)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Monarco (P) challenged a judgment which ruled against P on his action
seeking partition and accounting of a joint tenancy, and ruled in favor of Lo Greco's (D)
cross-complaint seeking a declaration of D as a constructive trustee.
FACTS: In 1926, Carmela and Natale Castiglia orally promised Christie Lo Greco (D) that
if he would abandon his plans to leave home and work on their farm instead, they would leave
him the farm when they died. D worked for room and board for twenty years, and the value of
the farm rose from $4,000 to $100,000. In 1941 both Carmela and Natale executed wills
leaving all their property to Christie with exception of small devised to Rosie and John and
$500 to Monarco (P). Natale secretly changed his will to leave his interest in the farm to
his grandson, P. Without informing D or Carmela he arranged the necessary conveyances to
terminate the joint tenancies and executed a will leaving all of his property to P. The will
was probated and the court distributed the property to P. P brought an action for partition
and an accounting. By cross-complaint Carmela asked that P be declared a constructive
trustee of the property he received as a result of Natale's breach of his agreement to keep
the property in joint tenancy. On the basis of the foregoing facts, the trial court gave
judgment for Ds and cross-complainant, and P has appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment