SCHWARTZREICH V. BAUMAN-BASCH, INC.
231 N.Y. 196 (1921)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a breach of contract action for an employment contract.
Bauman (D) appealed a decision reversing a judgment in favor of D and reinstating a jury
verdict in favor of Schwartzreich (P) regarding a claim for breach of contract.
FACTS: Bauman-Basch, Inc. (D) hired Schwartzreich (P) as a clothes designer for $90 per
week. P received an offer from a third party to work as a clothes designer for $110 per
week. P informed D that he intended to leave unless D gave him a raise. D agreed to pay P
$100 per week under a new contract. D subsequently refused to pay P the higher wages. P was
discharged and sued on the contract. D's defense was that there was no consideration for the
new contract because P was already obligated to perform the same duties at a lower price. P
claimed that D raised his wages to $100 per week after P merely informed D that he had
another job offer. The trial judge instructed the jury that if P and D both revoked the
contract, then P could recover damages for a breach of the $100 per week contract. P got the
jury verdict and the judge set it aside. P appealed. The appeal court upheld the instruction
and reinstated the jury verdict. D then appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment