VINES V. ORCHARD HILLS, INC.
181 Conn. 501, 435 A.2d 1022 (1980)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the down payment from a cancelled real estate
contract for sale. Vines (P) contracted to buy a condo and made a down payment that was
considered to be liquidated damages by the contract. P decided not to take the condo and
filed suit to recover the down payment. The court sustained a judgment in favor of P and
Orchard (D) appealed.
FACTS: Vines (P) placed a down payment of $7,880 on a condominium from Orchard Hills (D)
selling for $78,800. The signed contract stipulated that the down payment would be the
liquidated damages in case of default. P decided not to go through with the sale in that he
was just transferred to New Jersey and informed D of those circumstances. D refused to
refund the down payment. D demurred to the complaint and asked for summary judgment on the
damages clause but was denied. At trial, P established that the value of the condominium had
a fair market value of $160,000. The trial concluded that, because D had gained a windfall
of approximately $80,000, P was entitled to recover their down payment. No evidence showed
the market value of the condominium at the time of P's breach of their contract or the
damages sustained by D as a result of that breach. Judgment was rendered for P for the down
payment and D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment