WASSENAAR V. TOWNE HOTEL 331 N.W.2d 357 (1983) CASE BRIEF

WASSENAAR V. TOWNE HOTEL
331 N.W.2d 357 (1983)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from an award of damages for a breach of an employment contract.
FACTS: Wassenaar (P) was hired by Towne (D) as the general manger of its hotel. The contract provided for a three-year period of employment renewable at the employee's option, and a stipulated damages clause in case D terminated P before the expiration of the contract. D terminated P's employment 21 months prior to the expiration date. P was then unemployed for about 10 weeks when he obtained another job at another hotel. P sued D for damages. D argued that P had failed to mitigate his damages. P argued that mitigation was irrelevant because of the stipulated damages clause in the contract. The trial judge ruled that P had not duty to mitigate; which was an affirmation of the validity of the stipulated damages clause. The jury gave P 21 months worth of pay from the unexpired term of the contract. The court of appeals reversed holding that the stipulated damages clause was a penalty; in that the amount of damages from a breach of employment contract can easily be computed by the trial court. P appealed.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

No comments:

Post a Comment