WESTERN WATERPROOFING CO. v. SPRINGFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY 669 F. Supp. 901 (C.D. Ill. 1987) CASE BRIEF

WESTERN WATERPROOFING CO. V. SPRINGFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY
669 F. Supp. 901 (C.D. Ill. 1987)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is a third party suit by an unpaid subcontractor against a public contracting agency. Western (P), subcontractors, brought an action against Springfield (D) housing authority to recover amounts due under a construction contract. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment.
FACTS: Western (P) was a subcontractor hired by Bildoc under a Springfield Housing Authority (D) waterproofing project. Under Illinois law, D was to require Bildoc to obtain a payment bond. The contract required a performance bond. P finished its work and was never paid by Bildoc. P could not collect on its default judgment against Bildoc. P then sued D as a third party beneficiary for failing to ensure that Bildoc obtained a payment bond. D claimed that the contract only required a performance bond. P claimed it required both a performance bond and a payment bond. The parties filed motions for summary judgment.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

No comments:

Post a Comment