ALLEN V. HYATT REGENCY-NASHVILLE HOTEL
668 S.W.2d 286 (1984)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action for damages resulting from the theft of a car.
Appealed. Hyatt (D) challenged a finding in favor of Allen (P), the vehicle owner that the
vehicle in question was stolen while in the parking garage operated by D, and that a
bailment for hire had been created.
FACTS: Allen parked his wife's (P) car in a parking garage owned by the Hyatt Regency
(D). Although Allen did not intend to register as a guest at the hotel, the parking garage
was open to the public. In order to get into the garage, Allen received a ticket which was
solely for the purpose of recording the amount of time spent in the lot. The back of the
ticket recited that it was to be presented to the cashier upon leaving the garage, and that
D assumed no responsibility for loss due to fire, theft, or collision. However, D employed
security guards whose duties included patrolling the parking garage. When Allen returned to
the garage, the car had been stolen. Allen notified a security guard, who told him that he
had received a report that someone may have been tampering with a car in the garage. The
guard told Allen that he had investigated, but found nothing suspicious. P sued. Both lower
courts found that a bailment had been created when Allen parked the car in D's garage, and
held D liable for the theft of the car
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment