ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES V. COLE
2011 Ark. 145 (2011)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Cole (Ps) filed a complaint against the State of Arkansas (Ds)
against the constitutionality of a ballot initiative entitled 'An Act Providing That an
Individual Who is Cohabiting Outside of a Valid Marriage May Not Adopt or Be a Foster Parent
of a Child Less Than Eighteen Years Old.'
FACTS: Ds moved to dismiss P's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted. The circuit court entered an order dismissing Count 11 of the complaint and
deferring judgment on the motions to dismiss concerning Counts 1-10 upon a full hearing of
the evidence. After conducting discovery, everybody moved for summary judgment. The circuit
court granted P's motion for summary judgment on Count 10 and declared Act 1
unconstitutional under the Arkansas Constitution; granted D's motions to dismiss and motions
for summary judgment on all of the claims asserted under the United States Constitution
(Counts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 12); and dismissed the remaining claims under the Arkansas
Constitution (Counts 2, 4, 6, 8, and 13), determining that it was not necessary to reach
them. The circuit court further determined that because Act 1 burdens the fundamental right
to privacy implicit in the Arkansas Constitution, the constitutionality of Act 1 must be
analyzed under strict or heightened scrutiny, which means it cannot pass constitutional
muster unless it provides the least restrictive method available that is narrowly tailored
to accomplish a compelling state interest. The circuit court found that 'Initiated Act 1 is
facially invalid because it casts an unreasonably broad net over more people than is needed
to serve the State's compelling interest. It is not narrowly tailored to the least
restrictive means necessary to serve the State's interest in determining what is in the best
interest of the child.' The circuit court, therefore, found Act 1 unconstitutional. Ds
appealed and P cross-appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment on the balance
of her claims.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment