BAYLISS V. BAYLISS
550 So. 2d 986 (Ala. 1989)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the post minority education of a child from
divorce.
FACTS: Patrick was the son of Cherry (W) and John (H). The marriage was terminated by
divorce when Patrick was 12. When Patrick was 18, W filed a petition to modify the final
judgment of divorce in order to have H pay for college for Patrick. The reasons advanced for
this decree was that H was wealthy, that Patrick had the aptitude, that H refused to
contribute, and that both W and H had attended college. The trial court modified the decree
and H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment