BIRTH MOTHER V. ADOPTIVE PARENTS AND NEW HOPE CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY
59 P.3d 1233 (2002)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Mother (M) filed a complaint alleging several claims, including
breach of contract, based on the adoptive parents' noncompliance with the communication
agreement. The adoptive parents and New Hope (D) filed a motion to dismiss, which the
district court granted. M appealed.
FACTS: M executed a document with D entitled 'Agreement Regarding Communication With
And/Or Contact Between Birth Parents, Child Adoptee, and Adoptive Parents' (communication
agreement), which New Hope had prepared. The communication agreement stated that the birth
mother, her ex-husband, and New Hope 'entered into a post adoption communication and contact
agreement which is in the child's best interests.' M selected the adoptive parents, and
after meeting them, she relinquished her parental rights and consented to the adoption. The
adoptive parents signed the communication agreement, which required that any prospective
adoptive parent of the child agree to and abide by its terms. D agreed to call M when they
first got home with the child and then once a month for the first three months the child was
in their custody. D further agreed to provide M with pictures of the child and letters
detailing her progress. M could request photos every six months. They also consented to
allow M to visit the child on or near each of the child's first three birthdays and to send
M videotape when the child started walking. M eventually filed a motion objecting to the
adoption and demanding that D return the child to her. Subsequently D no longer permitted M
contact with the child. The district court denied M's motion and later granted D's petition
to adopt the child. M sought specific performance of the communication agreement or, in the
alternative, monetary damages. Ds filed a motion to dismiss. The district court entered its
order granting the motion to dismiss. The adoption decree is 'the final and only document
governing the terms of adoption,' and therefore, M needed to seek relief under the adoption
decree. Because the adoption decree did not refer to the communication agreement, and is the
sole document governing the adoption, it provided no relief for M as to claims involving the
communication agreement. The court dismissed the complaint and M appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment