BLAKELEY V. GORIN
313 N.E.2d 903 (Mass. 1974)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over restrictive covenants.
FACTS: Blakeley (P) owns land subject to restrictions put on the land in 1850. Gorin (D)
is the owner of adjacent land with an apartment building on that land. The issue was that of
the required passageway. The trial court found that D had a substantial and actual benefit
for enforcement of the restriction but the restrictions were obsolete and that D was only
entitled to nominal damages. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment