BLONDIN V. DUBOIS
189 F.3d 240 (2nd Cir. 1999)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an international child custody dispute.
FACTS: H and W met in the summer of 1990 and began living together but never wed. A
daughter was born in 1991 and a son in 1995. Family life was turbulent. W testified that H
beat her and that he did so with the children in her arms and that once H twisted an
electrical cord around her neck and threatened to kill her. W left the home and went to live
in a battered women's shelter but once again W returned to H. The cycle repeated itself.
Eventually the parties went to court but that case was dropped when they reconciled once
again. H and W continued in their ways with H beating W. Eventually W took the children from
France to the U.S. W concedes that she wrongfully removed the children from France and even
forged the signature of H to obtain passports for the children. W contends that she did this
to protect the children from a physically abusive environment. H denies that he has abused
the children. H sought a court order in France that sought the children's return to France
under The Hague Convention. The court held an immediate evidentiary hearing under The Hague
Convention. It was determined that in fact H was abusive and hit the children as well. The
older child told the judge that both parents beat her but that H did so more than W. H's
Hague petition was denied; the children would face a grave risk if returned to H's custody
and that H would be unable to support the children. H appealed. The French authorities were
contacted and assured the U.S court that measures would be taken to assure the children's
safety if returned while a French court determined custody.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment