BRADY V. UNITED STATES
397 U.S. 742 (1970)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255, claiming that a plea
of guilty was not voluntarily given.
FACTS: Petitioner was charged with kidnapping and because of the harm to the victim; he
faced a maximum penalty of death. Petitioner made no serious attempt to reduce the
possibility of a death penalty by waiving a jury trial. Upon learning that his codefendant,
who had confessed to the authorities, would plead guilty and be available to testify against
him, petitioner changed his plea to guilty. His plea was accepted after the trial judge
twice questioned him as to the voluntariness of his plea. He was sentenced to 50 years'
imprisonment, later reduced to 30. Eight years later, Petitioner sought relief under 28
U.S.C. 2255, claiming that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily given because 1201(a)
operated to coerce his plea, because his counsel exerted impermissible pressure upon him,
and because his plea was induced by representations with respect to reduction of sentence
and clemency. It was also alleged that the trial judge had not fully complied with Rule 11
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The District Court denied relief, held that
1201(a) was constitutional, and found that petitioner decided to plead guilty when he
learned that his codefendant was going to plead guilty. He pled guilty 'by reason of other
matters and not by reason of the statute' or because of any acts of the trial judge. The
Tenth Circuit affirmed. Petitioner claims that United States v. Jackson, 390 U. S. 570
(1968), requires reversal of that holding.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment