BROWN V. LOBER
75 Ill.2d 547, 389 N.E. 2d 1188 (1979)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Lober (D) appealed from a decision which reversed the trial court's
finding that although Ds breached the covenant of seisin, Brown's (P) suit was barred by the
statute of limitations, but found that P's cause of action on the covenant of quiet
enjoyment was not barred.
FACTS: In 1947, the original owners of land conveyed that land to Bost, reserving a 2/3
interest in mineral rights. Bost then conveyed the land to Brown (P) in 1957 by a general
warranty deed containing no exceptions. P was going to convey the mineral rights in the
property for $6,000 in 1974 but discovered that they only had a one-third interest. P had to
renegotiate its contract for the sale of the rights and could only receive $2,000 for his
one-third interest. The prior grantor had never made any attempt to exercise his mineral
rights. The statute of limitations (10 years) barred action on present covenants for breach
of warranty, so P sued Bost's executor, Lober (D), for breach of the covenant of quiet
enjoyment. The trial court found for D, but the appellate court reversed. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment