CHAFFEE V. SESLAR
786 N.E.2d 705 (2003)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Seslar (P) sued Chaffee (D) alleging that Ds performance of a
sterilization procedure had been negligent and seeking damages for the future expenses of
raising a child. D filed a motion for preliminary determination. The court denied the motion
and certified the order for interlocutory appeal. D appealed.
FACTS: D performed a partial salpingectomy on P. The purpose was to sterilize P, who had
already borne four children, so that she could not become pregnant again. After undergoing
the surgery, however, P conceived, and on August 5, 1999, she delivered a healthy baby. P
filed a proposed complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance alleging that D's
performance of the procedure had been negligent and seeking damages for the future expenses
of raising the child through college, including all medical and educational expenses. D
filed a motion for preliminary determination, to limit the amount of recoverable damages and
a determination that the costs of raising a healthy child born after a sterilization
procedure are not recoverable as a matter of law. D's motion was denied but certified for
interlocutory appeal.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment