CITY OF MILWAUKEE V. BURNETTE
637 N.W.2d 447 (2001)
NATURE OF THE CASE: City (P) sought an injunction against prostitutes (Ds) enjoining them
from prostitution related activities in the city. The court granted the city's motion for
summary judgment and Ds appealed.
FACTS: P brought an action against Ds for being a nuisance by committing prostitution.
The case was decided on summary judgment. The injunction was entered by the trial court on
an amended complaint filed by P alleging that Ds were prostitutes and that their
prostitution activities in specified areas were a 'public nuisance.' Ds appealed from a
judgment permanently enjoining them from engaging in prostitution-related activities within
certain specified areas in the City of Milwaukee. Ds submitted affidavits stating that the
injunction sought by P would interfere with their ability to live their lives in peace and
to interact with friends and family members. They expressed concerns that they would violate
the injunction if they spoke to someone who might be a prostitute even though they did not
know it. They also averred that they were 'confused by what the injunction requires of me.'
A Dr. Miller challenged P's attempt to show a connection between prostitution and drugs,
crime, and disease. Additionally, Dr. Miller avers, contrary to P's contention, that
prostitutes do not act in concert. This appeal was taken.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment