COLONNA V. COLONNA
855 A.2d 648 (Pa. 2004)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Mary Colonna (M), mother, sought review of the order which reversed
the order from trial court that ordered that she, a parent with partial custody, receive
child support from Robert Colonna (F), father, a parent with primary custody.
FACTS: M and F were married in 1983 and separated in 1996. F sought primary legal and
physical custody of the parties' four children, who at the time ranged in age from nine to
three years old. The parties agreed to a temporary order of shared legal and physical
custody, pursuant to which the children lived three and one-half days per week with each
parent. They later amended the agreement to provide that the children would alternate
between parental homes on a weekly basis. The trial court ordered F to pay M $6,132.00 per
month ($73,584.00 per year) in child support and to provide health insurance for M and the
children. The trial court also ordered F to pay the interest portion of the mortgage on the
marital home; homeowners, personal property and automobile insurance; private school
tuition; and other expenses. On June 18, 1998, the trial court reduced F's monthly support
payment to $5,132.00 per month ($61,584.00 per year) because it determined that M's counsel
fees had improperly been included as a reasonable need of the children. It further reduced
his obligation to $3,132.00 per month ($37,584.00 per year) on August 18, 1998 based on
credits for overpayment of M's counsel fees. The trial court awarded primary legal and
physical custody to F during the school year, and primary legal and physical custody to M
during the summer. M has partial custody of one or more of the children on Tuesday and
Thursday during the school year, and F has partial custody of one or more of the children on
Tuesday and Thursday during the summer. The parties alternate holidays and weekends
throughout the year, and each parent has two weeks with the children for summer vacation. F
sought to terminate child support on the basis that he was now the children's primary
custodian. F introduced his 1997 tax return indicating monthly net income of $16,130.00
which was a significant decrease from the monthly net income of $85,942.00 shown on his 1996
tax return. He presented evidence of living expenses and reasonable needs in the amount of
$14,834.23 per month. M had a net earning capacity of $4,607.00 per month. Mother presented
the same reasonable needs as she did during the 1997 support hearing, namely $28,208.00 per
month for herself and the children, with $21,106.00 per month attributable to the children.
She maintained that her expenses were the same as they had been when the parties shared
custody equally. M had custody 27% of the year, and F had custody 73% of the year. After
some calculations the court determined that M's obligation with F having 73% of the time
would be $11,309. F's annual obligation would be $14,833 with M having custody 27% of the
time. Offsetting one against the other leaves the support obligation of F to M of $3,524 per
year at $294 per month. M and F filed exceptions. The court ordered F to pay $810.00 per
month for support of the children. F appealed to the Superior Court, which reversed. F, as
the obligee, does not owe child support to M, who is the obligor. It concluded: Where
primary physical custody is changed from one parent to the other parent, no valid
justification remains for requiring the new custodial parent to continue payments that are
intended to be purely for the support, benefit and best interest of the children.
Consequently, directing support payments to a non-custodial parent . . . serves no purpose
for the children after custody changes and would only confer a personal benefit upon the
non-custodial parent if the payments were allowed to continue. This appeal resulted.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment