CORN PRODUCTS REFINING CO. V. COMMISSIONER
350 U.S. 46 (1955)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the characterization of commodity futures.
FACTS: P made products from grain corn. It used from 35-60 million bushels of corn per
year in its products from 1937-1942. Most of its contracts were short-term 30 day orders and
at times P would sell to a few customers on long term contracts. Droughts in 1934 and 1936
caused a sharp increase in the price of grain. P only had a storage capacity of 2.3 million
bushels of corn and eventually from price increases found that it could not compete with
cane and beet sugar prices. To avoid this in the future, P began to take long term positions
in corn futures to maintain stability in its pricing. When prices were favorable, P would
buy futures and take delivery on those contracts for needed production and sell the
remainder if no shortage was imminent. If a shortage appeared, it sold futures only as it
bought spot corn for production. P made no effort to protect itself against a decline in
prices. P netted $680,587.39 in 1940 from its strategy and lost $109,969.38 in 1942. P
reported these figures as ordinary profit and loss. However it has now changed its mind and
has decided that the futures were capital assets under 117. The IRS disagreed and the tax
court and court of appeals agreed with the IRS.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment