CRAMER V. COMMISSIONER
55 T.C. 1125 (1971)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was dispute over the tax deductibility of property taxes.
FACTS: Cramer (P) sold property to Osborn under a land sale contract. Osborn eventually
failed to make the property tax payments as required and also failed to make the monthly
payments on the loan. P foreclosed and got repossession of the property in 1966. P also made
property tax payments on her mother's property and eventually her mother gave her a
quitclaim deed to the property the next year after the taxes were paid. P also purchased a
new residence and paid property taxes on it and in sum total P claimed all the property tax
payments as deductions. The IRS allowed the deductions for the Clearview street property as
that was P's residence but denied them on her mother's property and the property that was
repossessed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment