DURAN V. NEFF
366 So.2d 169 (1979)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a medical malpractice action.
FACTS: A trial was being presented and at 5:10 P.M. counsel for P suggested the court
take a short recess before permitting him to put on an expert witness, whose examination
would be lengthy. The court declined that request and recessed until the next day. P was
unable to produce the witness the next day. A directed verdict was rendered for D. P
appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment