DYKMAN V. DYKMAN
98 Ark.App. 145 (2007)
NATURE OF THE CASE: H appealed an award of alimony to W.
FACTS: H who is 85 is a doctor of psychology and W is a psychiatrist who is 52. W was
employed by a consulting firm in Dallas and delivered much of her considerable earnings to
H, in amounts up to $12,000 per month, with the express understanding that he would use
these funds for marital purposes, such as reduction of debt on the parties' real property.
In fact, H was planning to divorce W and assume an open relationship with one or more young
women, to whom he gave substantial gifts of automobiles, clothing from Victoria's Secret,
other gifts paid for with marital assets, and several checks for many thousands of dollars.
H was using marital assets to fund his extramarital affairs rather than pay debt on marital
property. H forged W's signature to obtain a second mortgage on one of their properties
without her knowledge. He also fraudulently forged W's name to tax returns.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment