E.E. V. O.M.G.R.
20 A.3d 1171 (2011)
NATURE OF THE CASE: E.E. (P) filed a motion to terminate O.M.G.R.'s (D), sperm donor's,
parental rights to a child conceived by artificial insemination, based on the parties'
contract providing for such termination.
FACTS: P is a single woman without a partner who wished to have a child. She did not wish
to assume the expense of purchasing sperm through a sperm bank or use a licensed physician
in order to effect the insemination. P secured her friend, D., to donate his sperm, which
she transported to its intended location with a kitchen turkey baster. Shortly following the
child's conception, the parties entered into an agreement dated April 12, 2010, whereby D
contracted to surrender and terminate all future rights and responsibilities to the child
and P assumed all financial responsibility for the child. The child, G.J.E., was born. No
name was listed on the birth certificate as the child's father. Following the child's birth,
the parties again signed a consent order, indicating again that D had surrendered all rights
and responsibilities relating to the child and P had assumed full responsibility for the
child's health and well-being. The consent order was submitted to the court.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment