FLORIDA V. ROYER
460 U.S. 491 (1983)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is an appeal from the suppression of evidence in a marijuana
conviction.
FACTS: Upon request, but without oral consent, Royer (D) produced his airline ticket
(which was under an assumed name) and driver's license to detectives. The detectives
informed D that they were narcotics investigators and suspected him of transporting
narcotics. Without returning either D's ticket or his license, they asked D to accompany
them to a small room adjacent to the concourse. One of the detectives retrieved D's luggage
and brought it to the room. D did not respond to the detectives' request for consent to
search his luggage. However, D produced a key and unlocked one suitcase, in which marijuana
was found. D did not know the combination to the other suitcase, but did not object to it
being opened. The officers pried it open and found more marijuana. The Trial court denied
D's pretrial petition to suppress the evidence. D was convicted of felony possession of
marijuana. The Appeals court reversed, holding that D had been involuntarily confined
without probable cause, and the detention exceeded the limit restraint permitted by Terry v.
Ohio, and the consent was invalid because it was tainted. The state (P) appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment