GRIMM V. GRIMM
82 Conn.App 41 (2004)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Robert (H) appealed the dissolution of his marriage on a number of
issues.
FACTS: Beverly (W) commenced divorce proceedings in Ohio. Eventually W brought an action
for dissolution of the marriage on the ground that she had lived separately and apart from
the defendant for more than one year. W withdrew that action after the parties briefly
resumed cohabitation. In 1992, W brought another divorce proceeding. She withdrew that
action after the H obtained employment in Connecticut where she was residing. In 1997, W
brought a divorce proceeding in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk, which she
subsequently withdrew when she commenced the present action in Danbury seeking dissolution
of her marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown. H filed a motion to dismiss the
action, or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to the judicial district of
Stamford-Norwalk. The court denied H's motion. The court dissolved the parties' marriage and
entered various financial orders. H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment