HALLORAN V. VIRGINIA CHEMICALS, INC. 41 N.Y.2d 386, 393 N.Y.S.2d 341, 361 N.E.2d 991 (1977) CASE BRIEF

HALLORAN V. VIRGINIA CHEMICALS, INC.

41 N.Y.2d 386, 393 N.Y.S.2d 341, 361 N.E.2d 991 (1977)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Virginia Chemicals (D) appealed from an order, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment upon a verdict in favor of Halloran (P) automobile mechanic in a personal injury products liability action.

FACTS: Halloran (P) was injured when a can of Freon he was heating to enable him to put it in an automobile air conditioner exploded. P was heating the can by placing it in a water-filled coffee can, and heating the water with an immersion coil. Virginia Chemicals (D), the company which packaged and sold the Freon offered evidence that P had used this method of heating cans of Freon in the past, ignoring the warnings on the cans' labels. The lower courts excluded the evidence on the principle that evidence of a party's prior instances of carelessness cannot be used to prove carelessness on the occasion in question. D appeals the judgment in P's favor.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner