HENDERSON V. COMMISSIONER
143 F.3d 497 (9th Cir. 1998)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Henderson (P) appealed a Tax Court, which upheld the disallowance of
P's claimed deduction under I.R.C. 162(a)(2) for living expenses incurred 'away from home'
while on a traveling ice show.
FACTS: P's parents lived in Boise. After graduating from the University of Idaho in 1989,
he maintained many personal contacts with Boise. P received mail at his parents' residence,
lived there between work assignments, and kept many belongings and his dog there. P also was
registered to vote in Idaho, paid Idaho state income tax, maintained an Idaho driver's
license, and maintained his bank account in Idaho. During 1990, P spent about two to three
months in Boise, staying at his parents' residence. While he was there, he performed a few
minor jobs to maintain or improve the family residence. P worked as a stage hand for Walt
Disney's World of Ice, a traveling show. P was employed on a tour by tour basis. Following
the completion of a tour, he returned to his parents' home in Boise. He worked on three
different Disney tours that year. P traveled on tour to thirteen states and Japan. The tours
stopped in each city for a few days or weeks. While traveling, he received $30 per day to
cover expenses. P claims that he looked periodically for employment in Boise between the
tours, but the evidence showed that he worked as a stage hand only for a single ZZ Top
concert. P claimed deductions under 162(a)(2 on his living expenses incurred away from
home. The IRS (D) disallowed them because P was an itinerant taxpayer. It held that P lacked
any business reason for living in Boise between ice shows. P petitioned and the Tax Court
affirmed. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment