HILL V. SKINNER
81 Ohio.App. 375, 79 N.E.2d 787 (1947)
NATURE OF THE CASE: In an action seeking to hold Skinner (D) dog owners liable for
damages arising out of an episode in which the dog was alleged to have injured Hill (P)
minor, Ds challenged the judgment, which awarded damages to P.
FACTS: Hill (P), a four-year-old, filed suit against Skinner (D) for injuries he
allegedly suffered when D's dog bit him. At trial there was no evidence of the attack, or of
injury to P other than P's testimony. D argued that P was not a competent witness because of
his age. D appeals a judgment in P's favor.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment