HOSKINS V. HOSKINS
2015 WL 222177 (2015)
NATURE OF THE CASE: H appeals from an order modifying timesharing with his son.
FACTS: H and W were divorced on June 26, 2008. They shared joint custody of their son
with no designation of a primary residential parent. On March 4, 2013, W filed a motion to
modify custody and the parties' parenting schedule, asserting H received a speeding ticket,
had remarried and divorced, and moved three times since the parties' divorce. The trial
court sua sponte appointed a regularly practicing attorney as GAL to represent the child's
interest and ordered the GAL to file a report with the court within thirty days. The GAL
eventually filed a report with the court. The trial court entered an order continuing joint
custody and ordered the child reside primarily with W. H was awarded timesharing in
accordance with the local visitation schedule. H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment