HOUSE V. BELL
547 U.S. 518 (2006)
NATURE OF THE CASE: House (D) was convicted of the murder of Carolyn Muncey's and
sentenced to death. State's (P) case included evidence showing semen on her clothing and
small bloodstains consistent with her blood but not D's on his jeans. The jury found the
aggravating factor that the murder was committed in the commission of rape or kidnapping.
The State Supreme Court affirmed. D was denied state post-conviction relief. The Federal
District Court denied habeas relief because D did not fall within the 'actual innocence'
exception to procedural default recognized in Schlup v. Delo and Sawyer v. Whitley. The
Supreme Court granted certiorari.
FACTS: Local residents found Muncey's body concealed amid brush and tree branches on an
embankment roughly 100 yards up the road from her driveway. She was seen last on the prior
day around 8 p.m. The time of death was between 9 and 11 p.m. Mrs. Muncey had a black eye,
both her hands were bloodstained up to the wrists, and she had bruises on her legs and neck.
The bruises were consistent with a 'traumatic origin,' i.e., a fight or a fall on hard
objects. It was concluded Mrs. Muncey had been choked, but he ruled this out as the cause of
death. The cause of death, in Dr. Carabia's view, was a severe blow to the left forehead
that inflicted both a laceration penetrating to the bone and, inside the skull, a severe
right-side hemorrhage, likely caused by Mrs. Muncey's brain slamming into the skull opposite
the impact. The head injury was consistent either with receiving a blow from a fist or other
instrument or with striking some object. D was questioned shortly after the body was found.
That evening, House answered further questions during a voluntary interview at the local
jail. D claimed--falsely that he spent the entire evening with his girlfriend, Donna Turner,
at her trailer. Asked whether he was wearing the same pants he had worn the night before, D
replied--again, falsely--that he was. D was on probation at the time, having recently been
released on parole following a sentence of five years to life for aggravated sexual assault
in Utah. D had scratches on his arms and hands, and a knuckle on his right ring finger was
bruised. He attributed the scratches to his girlfriend's cats and the finger injury to
recent construction work tearing down a shed. Turner informed authorities that D left her
trailer around 10:30 or 10:45 p.m. to go for a walk. D returned later--she was not sure
when--hot and panting, missing his shirt and his shoes. D claimed that he had been assaulted
by someone in a car who fired two shots at him. Turner testified that she 'thought maybe he
ex-husband had something to do with it.' Turner's trailer was located just under two miles
by road, through hilly terrain, from the Muncey residence. Law enforcement officers also
questioned the victim's husband. Mr. Muncey had spent the evening at a weekly dance at a
recreation center roughly a mile and a half from his home. Mr. Muncey admitted leaving the
dance early, but said it was only for a brief trip to the package store to buy beer. He also
stated that he and his wife had had sexual relations Saturday morning. Police seized the
pants D was wearing the night Mrs. Muncey disappeared. The heavily soiled pants were sitting
in a laundry hamper. FBI testing revealed human blood on the pants and D was arrested. D was
charged House with capital murder. FBI testing showed--that semen consistent (or so it
seemed) with D's was present on Mrs. Muncey's nightgown and panties, and that small
bloodstains consistent with Mrs. Muncey's blood but not D's appeared on the jeans belonging
to D. The semen was from the ABO blood group a characteristic shared by 80 percent of the
population, including D. The source of semen on the gown was blood-type A, D's own blood
type. As to the semen on the panties, they found only the H blood-group substance, which A
and B blood-type secretors secrete along with substances A and B, and which O-type secretors
secrete exclusively. P claimed that Ds A antigens could have 'degraded' into H. P concluded
that both semen deposits could have come from D, though he acknowledged that that the H
antigen could have come from Mrs. Muncey herself if she was a secretor--something he 'was
not able to determine.' Mr. Muncey was himself blood-type A (as was his wife). It was
acknowledged that 'a saliva sample' would have sufficed to determine whether Mr. Muncey was
a secretor; the State did not provide such a sample, though it did provide samples of Mr.
Muncey's blood. It was determined that the blood's source was type A (the type shared by D,
the victim, and Mr. Muncey). Fiber analysis showed blue jean material but it was admitted
that such material was common place. It was also admitted that D's pants, though cotton
garments both transfer and retain fibers readily and neither hair nor fiber consistent with
the victim's hair or clothing was found on D's pants. D's shoes were found several months
after the crime in a field near Turner's home. Turner delivered them to authorities. The
jury nor D never learned of that. P tested the shoes for blood and found none. D's shirt was
not found. In closing argument P argued that a death occurred during the perpetration of a
rape or kidnapping. The jury found D guilty of murder in the first degree. At sentencing the
jury found aggravation and recommended the death penalty, which the trial judge imposed. The
Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed D's conviction and sentence, describing the evidence
against D as 'circumstantial' but 'quite strong.' D filed a pro se petition for
post-conviction relief, arguing he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. The
trial court dismissed the petition. The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, and
both the Tennessee Supreme Court and the Supreme Court denied review. D filed a second
post-conviction petition in state court reasserting his ineffective-assistance claim and
seeking investigative and/or expert assistance. The Tennessee Supreme Court held that D's
claims were barred under a state statute providing that claims not raised in prior
post-conviction proceedings are presumptively waived, and that courts may not consider
grounds for relief 'which the court finds should be excluded because they have been waived
or previously determined.' The Supreme Court denied certiorari. D sought federal habeas
relief, asserting numerous claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial
misconduct. The District Court held an evidentiary hearing to determine whether D fell
within the 'actual innocence' exception to procedural default recognized as to substantive
offenses in Schlup and as to death sentences in Sawyer v. Whitley. D attacked the semen and
blood evidence used at his trial and presented other evidence, including a putative
confession, suggesting that Mr. Muncey, not D, committed the murder. The District Court
denied relief, holding that House had neither demonstrated actual innocence of the murder
under Schlup nor established that he was ineligible for the death penalty under Sawyer. The
Sixth Circuit affirmed, but its opinion was withdrawn and the case taken en banc. A divided
en banc court certified state-law questions to the Tennessee Supreme Court. The Tennessee
Supreme Court did not answer. The case returned to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Sixth Circuit. This time an eight-judge majority affirmed the District Court's denial of
habeas relief. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment