HOWARD V. HOWARD
336 S.W.3d 433 (2011)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Roy (H) appealed from a decision that a trial court could enforce
through contempt an obligation under a divorce decree to make payments to a creditor even
after a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge and even when the other spouse failed to institute an
adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court.
FACTS: H and Sondra (W) divorced. H was ordered to pay child support and to repay a loan
on the couple's Durango which had been repossessed. Fifteen months after entry of the
decree, H filed a motion in the trial court to reduce his child support obligation because
of an alleged material change in circumstances. H filed a supporting affidavit in which he
claimed health problems, inability to find correctional work or similarly lucrative
positions, and filing for bankruptcy. W sought payment of her attorney's fees and sought to
have H held in contempt for failure to pay the debt on the repossessed Durango, for which
she had been subjected to collection efforts by the creditor. H testified to filing
bankruptcy shortly after entry of the decree, to receiving a discharge in bankruptcy, and to
not having a deficiency judgment entered against him following the repossession of the Dodge
Durango. W received notice of the filing for bankruptcy and did nothing to challenge the
discharge of his debts. The trial court found H to be in contempt for failure to pay the
debt on the repossessed Durango. H appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed concluding that
H's obligation was not discharged under 11 United States Code (U.S.C.) 523(a)(15). The
statute had been amended, effective in 2005, to provide that a discharge under Chapter 7 (11
U.S.C. 727) does not discharge the debtor from any debt 'to a spouse, former spouse or
child' for something other than a 'domestic support obligation' (i.e., child support or
maintenance) that 'is incurred by the debtor in the course of a divorce or separation or in
connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree or other order of a court of record,
or a determination made in accordance with State or territorial law by a governmental unit.'
H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment