KEEBLE V. HICKERINGILL
Queen's Bench, 11 East 574, 103 Eng. Rep. 1127 (1707)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action on the case for interference with the lawful use
of land and an appeal from a judgment for interfering with the capture of wild animals.
FACTS: Keeble (P) placed duck decoys in a pond on his land to lure and catch wildfowl.
Hickeringill (D) fired six guns laden with gunpowder on two different days in an effort to
interfere with P's use of his land. D was successful in scaring away the ducks from P's
land. P sued for damages and won 20 pounds. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment