KINGSTON V. CHICAGO & N.W. RY.
191 Wis. 610, 211 N.W. 913 (1927)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Chicago (D) sought review of an order which entered a judgment for
Kingston (P) in a suit to recover for fire damage to his property.
FACTS: A forest fire was burning about one half to one mile northwesterly, nearly west,
of P's property. Another fire was burning about four miles northeast of P's property. These
two fires united in a region about 940 feet north of the railroad track. The line of fire
was about forty or fifty rods east and west. It then traveled south and burned P's property,
consisting of logs, timber, and poles on P's land. P claims that both fires which united
were set by D, one by a locomotive on its main line running north of Bonita, the other by a
locomotive on the branch about three miles west of Bonita and about a mile in a westerly
direction from the spur. The jury found that both fires were set by locomotives belonging to
D and that both fires constituted a proximate cause of the damage. D appealed. D contends
that there is no evidence to support the finding that either fire was set by D.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment